Intranet | Faculty Assembly Home | Faculty Websites | Faculty Resources | Academics | Web for faculty
updated 5/7/04


Please Note:  An updated and clarified version of the course/category descriptions is provided in the linked chart.  That version of the language will be the version discussed at Faculty Assembly on May 12.

To: The Faculty Assembly

From: CLA III Committee

Edward Saiff (TAS), Chair; Edward A. Shannon (AIS); Henry Frundt (SSHS); Maria Vail Guevara (CA); Eric Haye (SAB); Irene Kuchta (LIB); Martha Ecker (VPAA); Babette Varano (Institutional Research and Planning)

Date: May 5,2004

Re: CLA Gen Ed Report

 
Introduction

This report is a working document of CLA's Gen Ed proposal recommending a revised General Education/School Core proposal consistent with a reduction to a 33-Unit graduation requirement. The Provost, President, and now the Board of Trustees have all approved a new curriculum for our students, one based on a 33-course graduation requirement. While this graduation requirement means our students will take 7 fewer classes than they do now, it also means that they will take 3 classes more than they did (or would) under a 4-credit curriculum.

We have met consistently with Deans, ARC and received input from all the Units. The complexity of the issues involved and all the diverse viewpoints were taken into account and it was agreed that the best way to view Gen Ed is as a model that allows for flexibility as we move into the future and the implementation of the Unit Plan. Flexibility means more distribution categories and fewer core courses. While trying to develop a flexible model we wanted to find a balance - so that categories don't become so broad as to be meaningless, yet not too narrow to preclude a variety of courses from different parts of the college. CLA attempted with this model to avoid any one Unit or Convening Group "owning" any one part of Gen Ed. Our task was not to prescribe every last course we would like our students to take, but to develop a General Education program that would support our majors and leave time for our students to explore the curriculum on their own through freely chosen elective courses.

 

This proposal is for the hopeful implementation of CLA in Fall '05. Other worthy Gen Ed ideas have come forward in recent weeks that would require much more time to develop. In the event that the implementation of the Unit Proposal is delayed until Fall '06, we recommend further work on Gen Ed, in the form of ongoing meetings and discussions along the same vein as the recent work in CLA.

Guiding Rationale

The purpose of the general education program is to provide students with skills and knowledge outside of their major course of study that will legitimately constitute a quality Liberal Arts education. The mission emphasizes Interdisciplinary and Experiential learning along with Multicultural and Global awareness. As we stated in our earlier report, some of the responsibility in delivering the college mission has been shifted to the School Cores, particularly experiential learning and interdisciplinary study. Along with these mission goals, Gen Ed should provide students with reading, writing and critical thinking skills.

Much discussion in CLA was devoted to understanding and addressing the particular needs of our students. As a result the Gen Ed proposal below reflects the concern about our students' grounding in History, both History in the sense of understanding the 'broad sweep', and history as seen through the various disciplines. As a result, the current 100 Level courses have been re-oriented to address these concerns, as will be further described below.

In addition, writing was identified as a major area of need. CLA proposes that all offerings in Gen Ed be writing intensive. If this is found to be too costly at the present time, CLA recommends shifting resources over time to realize this goal, and requiring it as much as possible in all areas.

Our current Gen Ed is a maze of double counting, which, though expedient to effectively shrink requirements for some of our students, actually creates an incredible morass in advisement, and more important, defeats the main purpose of Gen Ed in providing for a well-rounded education. If students take most of their Gen Ed requirements in their own Schools, they are not broadening their horizons, not given the opportunity to learn through other disciplines. Because of this, CLA recommends that only the "Readings in" courses double count, and that only at the discretion of the Units. Some exceptions to this might need to be made for certain large majors, but overall we want to stress the importance of exposing students to learning through disciplines outside of their majors. This will also simplify advisement, and be much clearer to students.

Considering the level of student preparedness, CLA also oriented Gen Ed to focus more on the lower level, leaving upper level courses in applied values, ethics and analytical reasoning to the majors and school cores, which already provided them. In effect, under our current system, most students already double count their upper level Gen Eds. CLA thought it appropriate that these higher level courses be offered through the majors and cores.

CLA GEN ED

Please note that the category definitions are 'working definitions' and are in need of refinement. Suggestions for altering category definitions are welcome, and should be offered to CLA as soon as possible. Please know that we have not intended to exclude input, or set these definitions in stone at this time.

  1. College Seminar

Rationale: Though the debate about College Seminar is vibrant, and many on campus question the academic viability of the course, CLA felt overall that, though not perfect, it is an important program to retain for the present time. Suggestions have been made transform College Seminar in many different ways. CLA initially recommended the Schools take over responsibility for College Seminar. Not all Schools took the challenge, and rather than eliminate it, CLA thought it wise to retain it for now, until a viable alternative could be developed that retained its strength while creating more consistency in its delivery.

 

Description: Incorporating the intercultural mission of the institution, each section of this course will have a distinctly different course description that includes an exposure to various cultural groups and traditions on campus and in the surrounding community. Presentations may be made by various on-campus bodies, for instance, the Latin American, Asian and African Studies minors. This course is also designed to provide students with an introduction to their intended majors. Students will also participate in presentations and discussions on important personal development issues to ease the transition from high school to college. This course is for new incoming freshmen.

1) College English (100 Level)

Rationale: The CLA Committee considered requiring 2 College English courses, but due to resource issues, did not recommend a change at this time.

2) Social Issues/ Perspectives in Business (100 Level)

Rationale: CLA felt this was an important core course to retain. It provides students with the language and perspective to discuss issues and understand the world around them.

Descriptions:

 

Social Issues: The purpose of this course is to provide a forum for the historical, academic and personal exploration of race, class, ethnicity and gender and the ways in which these become forms of oppression that impact on college students and American Society. It will cultivate in-depth conceptual approaches to these key areas.

 

Perspectives in Business: The purpose of this course is to explore modern American business. The course will examine the evolution of our economic system from historical, political, sociological, economic, and cultural perspectives, and will discuss current issues that involve industry within a changing social framework.

3) Quantitative Reasoning (100 Level)

Rationale: Intellectual inquiry often begins with a curiosity about a subject, which can only be satisfied by examining data. In order to meet this need and improve our students’ skill repertoire we combined 2 of the current Gen Ed categories (Math and Quantitative) to this one lower level requirement. As statistics, genetics, and global finance become ever more powerful forces in our environment, CLA considered it essential that students be given tools to critically assess data.

Category Definition: Courses in this category should advance students’ understanding of the creation, use, and interpretation of empirical information. This may include assessing data, presenting numerical information, and performing statistical tests, and it should always include a healthy skepticism of the use of numbers in advancing a particular point of view.

Example: 100 level Math courses that provide applied problem solving, statistics courses or journalism courses could be included in this category.

 

 

4) Science with Experiential Component (100 Level)

Rationale: CLA felt it was important for students to have at least one experience in their college education that applied science in a practical and physical way. Understanding the physical world through direct experience with it, either by observing the effects of man on the environment or through manipulating materials in a classical lab setting.

Category Description: Courses in this category should be 100 level Science or Environmental Studies courses that provide a significant experiential component. The experiential component could be a lab or a fieldwork experience. The experiential component should, however, allow students to create and analyze data these courses address the experiential aspect of the mission

 

  1. History (100 Level)

Rationale: Much discussion was devoted to this area of Gen Ed. Initially CLA discussed the effectiveness of offering only one semester of world history, and debated the merits of such an attempt. CLA was strongly in favor of strengthening the historical basis of our students' education and moved this offering around in different ways. Having created the "Readings in…" categories below, it was recognized that this "History" category could be an excellent introduction to what is the centerpiece of our proposal. The value of offering students 'the broad sweep' came to be evident as we developed this program.

Category Description: 100 Level Course in western civilization, world cultures and/or American history. These courses are designed to provide students with a historical context from which to understand historical process and method. Courses in this category should provide a 'broad sweep' of history.

Examples of courses in this category include but are not strictly limited to:


            AHST 101  Western Studies I
            AHST 102  Western Studies II
            AHST 107  Introduction to U.S. History I
            AHST 108  Introduction to U.S. History II
            AHST 110  World Civilizations I
            AHST 111  World Civilizations II

 

Readings in …(200 Level)

Rationale: CLA considered the level of student preparedness in understanding the world around them as limited to their own life experiences which begin in 1980. Much anecdotal information bemoaning students' lack of knowledge of key historical events was shared in our meetings, and CLA recognized an opportunity to re-orient the 100 level offerings to provide students with the context of the various disciplines over time. Recognizing that all attempts to divide categories into disciplinary areas are often outmoded, that reinventing theme based categories for such study ran the risk of creating cumbersome, and eventually meaningless categories, CLA none the less created 3 categories of courses. The "Readings in…" idea was inspired by "Readings in Humanities", the 'great books' core course that inspired many on the committee. We hoped that faculty would be inspired to transform current courses and even create new ones that introduced students to the great works, great films or great writings of their own disciplines. The key ideas that inspired us to become facutly could be shared with our students in such courses, while providing students with the major grounding ideas of various disciplines.

Category Description: "Readings in…" should provide students historical and intellectual grounding of thought as seen through the prism of the discipline. The great works and important historical figures who influenced the evolution of the area of study would be emphasized, along with the social/political context of their work. Courses would address subject matter in historical context, focusing on texts and materials demonstrating changes in thought over time. In addition courses in this new category would incorporate six information literacy goals:  framing the research question, accessing sources, evaluating sources, evaluating content, using information, and understanding ethical and legal issues affecting the use of information.  (as per middle states report) be writing intensive.

Note: Certain College Mission goals will be required in several "Readings in…" Categories.

 

Readings in Arts & Humanities -

Category Description: Courses in this category focus on the human and aesthetic experiences through analysis and interpretation of great artistic, literary or philosophical movements through time. Offerings should offer an international or multicultural context for understanding the discourse in the discipline from which the course emerges.

Example: Courses such as Survey of American Lit, Theater in Society, Music in our Time, History of Jazz, Latin American Literature, Existentialism, Critical Thinking, etc. could be offered in this category.

Readings in Social Science

Category Definition: These courses should provide students with an understanding of the social forces which shape human experience and society over time through the application of the scientific method to social groups and social processes. Courses in this category should have an intercultural perspective.

Example: Courses such as Gender Work and Family, Environmental History, Global Workplace and Social Movements could be included in this category.

Readings in Science

Category Definition: Courses in this category provide students with a historical perspective on scientific thought and/or environmental literacy. They focus on Science in a cultural context and provide an ethical perspective on issues in science such as sustainability, biological warfare, cloning, AIDS, hormones and behavior within a social, geographic and political context through time.

Example: Courses in this category could include Energy and Society, Ecology Economics and Ethics and Appropriate Technology.

 

 

 

World Cultures (200 - 300 Level)

Rationale: As the College is ever striving to enhance its international mission, CLA felt it was very important to provide an area specifically focusing on international education. Students need to broaden their perspective and be encouraged to go outside their comfort zone. To gain specific insight into a region or culture outside of the US is essential to becoming an educated person in our world.

Category Definition: Courses in this category should provide students with specific insight or experience in a culture, history or politics of regions outside of the United States.

Example: Courses in this category could be - 300 Level Language Courses, Study Abroad offerings, and such courses as Politics of Developing Nations, World Religions, Japan History, Politics and Culture, Music in Africa and the Americas, Colonial Latin America, International Political Economy, International Politics, etc.

 

Important Notes

This model provides a 10 Course Gen Ed, with one category double counting, making it effectively a 9 course Gen Ed Program. Certain exceptions to this double counting rule can be applied to very large majors, but these exceptions should be reviewed by ARC.

Senior Seminar

The overall consensus college wide concerning Senior Seminar is that it should be offered in the School Cores, or as a capstone experience in the majors. If in the future the faculty is invigorated to reintroduce Senior Seminar as an all-college, truly interdisciplinary requirement, they should be encouraged to devise it. The problems with offering the Senior Seminar have only worsened over time and though CLA recognizes the value of the ideal intended, at this point in time we recommend moving the offering to the Units, hoping they will retain a healthy level of interdisciplinary study, as originally intended.

School Cores

As outlined in our previous report, CLA has shifted some of the responsibility of delivering the college mission to the Schools. At this point the Schools have responded by beginning to redefine and orient their core offerings, but in an uneven and inconsistent way. In particular CLA strongly recommends that Schools take on the experiential component of the mission in a strong way, and to commit themselves to interdisciplinary study in the cores as much as possible. Due to the complex nature of devising Gen Ed, and to the diversity of what is offered in the schools, CLA hoped internships, field work, service learning and other experiential learning opportunities could be emphasized by the Schools. Many of the Schools have interdisciplinary cores already, and CLA recommends clearer articulation of this, and general strengthening of interdisciplinarity. In addition CLA had recommended that School Cores offer the Values/Ethics component on the 300 level and we continue to hope the Schools embrace the suggestion.

School Cores and Majors combined may not exceed 23 Units, and should be more in the range of 18 or 19 (together) so that students have room for electives, double majors, Teacher Certification, etc.

Gen Ed Implementation

CLA recommends that the ARC create a subcommittee to approve courses in Gen Ed in the initial implementation phase. After the program is in place, CLA recommends that ARC be guided by the category descriptions above and guide faculty in orienting their courses to fit the purpose and spirit of the categories. Gen Ed requires oversight since individual convening groups may not have the perspective of ARC are not empowered to decide on Gen Ed programs.

 Faculty Assembly Home