Provost's Evaluation March 31, 2004

Faculty Evaluation of Provost's

Administrative Performance

Spring 2004

The following survey is designed to assess faculty perceptions of administrative performance. Please use the block at the end of the form to comment on this individual. Thank you for your assistance.

In the past year, how often have you had personal professional contact with the

Provost?

Frequent Contact Infrequent Contact Not at All

 

In general, the Provost (DK, SD, D, N, A, SA)

1) intervenes to promote optimal working conditions when appropriate.

2) demonstrates concern for the professional development of faculty.

3) is effective in oral communication.

4) tolerates disagreement and/or constructive criticism.

6) solicits input from faculty before making important decisions, when appropriate

7) is willing to explain administrative decisions.

8) encourages an environment conducive to free exchange of ideas.

9) provides appropriate support for campus fund-raising activities.

10) provides appropriate leadership in planning for the College’s future.

11) actively represents Ramapo College within the local and regional communities.

12) actively represents Ramapo College within other communities (NJ state system, legislature, etc.)

13) provides strong support to Ramapo's teaching mission and academic standards.

14) provides strong support to Ramapo faculty scholarship and research.

15) provides strong support to Ramapo's public service mission.

16) is appropriately involved in campus activities.

17) provides an appropriate amount of communication with faculty.

18) delegates decision-making responsibilities when appropriate.

19) makes personnel appointments which further the mission of the university.

20) effectively identifies and resolves problems and controversies.

21) shows commitment to governance shared with faculty, staff, and students.

22) demonstrates a commitment to fundamental fairness and due process.

23) successfully advocates for resources to support the broader academic mission.

24) effectively allocates available financial resources.

25) has shown an ability to recognize, attract, and retain excellent college administrators and academic affairs staff.

26) shows a commitment to the key roles of the Library and information technology as resources for teaching and research.

27) is friendly and approachable.

28) engenders a feeling of trust.

 

Overall Evaluation:

Overall Performance rating for the Provost

Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent

 

Comments: