Ethics in Business

Class Notes

 

These class notes should help you isolate key words and ideas from the readings.  Please review and/or print these out prior to coming to class.  The notes are organized by author's name and page number.  Remember that many of our readings are linked online in the syllabus

 

BIBLE ONLINE

Job

Ÿ         Story of what happens to Job

Ÿ         Key questions: why does God do this to Job? What matters most in life to Job?  Why doesn't he renounce God? Is Job better off at the end of the story?

Matthew

Ÿ         This is the "Sermon on the Mount" spoken by Jesus to his followers

Ÿ         Values Jesus advances: meekness, humility, servility to God, holiness

Ÿ         Vs. making oaths, taking revenge, loving only those who are good to you

Ÿ         Riches of the heart vs. riches of the world

Ÿ         Loving money is a spiritual darkness

Ÿ         God will provide so don't stress material goods

 

AQUINAS ONLINE

Ÿ         Aquinas is medieval philosopher and works in natural law tradition = God has given us certain duties + rights

Ÿ         Format is to ask a question, list objections to it, and then answer objections

Ÿ         At issue in Question 66: is it ok to own property?

Ÿ         References to "the philosopher" = Aristotle, Aquinas's fav greek philosopher

Ÿ         References to Augustine = another Christian philosopher

Ÿ         66 concludes that common ownership is better than private so that we can share, some kind of ownership is natural and necessary in human life

Ÿ         Natural law = God's law; positive law = legal law

Ÿ         It's sin for the rich to use property to prevent to poor from advancing

Ÿ         At issue in Question 77: should you state defects of products?

Ÿ         77 concludes you should if the defects aren't obvious, if they are then there is no need to draw attention to them

Ÿ         Question 77 continued: is a retail markup of any service or product immoral?

Ÿ         Moderate profit is ok, it serves public good, but too much profit is immoral

Ÿ         Natural trade is fine, but trade for profit is only good if profit is used morally

 

KORAN ONLINE

The Cow

Ÿ         Koran is 7th C. text of what God revealed to prophet Mohammed through an angel

Ÿ         FYI: Islam, Christianity and Judaism have similar value system and shared origins in story of Abraham

Ÿ         Spend money according Allah's wishes and you will be rewarded

Ÿ         Alms giving = charity, section 2.271

Ÿ         Usury = making money off of interest.  Trade is different

Ÿ         Usury is uncharitable and Allah wants us to be charitable to each other

Pomeranz

Ÿ         Purpose: explain how Islamic Business Ethics can work in today's world

Ÿ         Shari'ah = Islamic ethical way of life

Ÿ         Share or give away wealth, so as to fairly distribute it to the entire community

Ÿ         Vs. interest: usury goes against a fair distribution of wealth

Ÿ         Dentist house example

Ÿ         Examples of how modern corps. try to meet needs of Muslim customers

 

KUNG PG. 13-39

Ÿ         Kung comes from natural law (= Christian) tradition but this finds commonality with all religions

Ÿ         Common set of core values in all religions can lead us to better world and individual order

Ÿ         "We are interdependent" is foundation of declaration

Ÿ         Assessment of world situation pg. 17

Ÿ         Spiritual persons base lives on an Ultimate Reality (= God?)

Ÿ         Reference to UN resolution pg. 20-1 (we will read this later on in term)

Ÿ         Improving the world isn't done by governmental, etc. reforms alone but by spiritual reform

Ÿ         'Do unto others' is found in all religions and should be norm for everyone

Ÿ         4 commitments listed pg. 24-34: respect for life, just economics, truthfulness, sex equality

Ÿ         Personal responsibility for improving the world

 

HUNTINGTON ONLINE

Ÿ         Note that this reading is 11 years old but still applies today

Ÿ         Huntington is contemporary poli scientist, describing world as he sees it

Ÿ         Cold war replaced with new spin on an older conflict: Ortho-Muslim vs. West

Ÿ         History of the West conflict with Islam

Ÿ         Africa and Russia next fronts in this clash

Ÿ         We have economic clash with Japan

Ÿ         Challenge for non-West is to be modern but still keep traditional values

Ÿ         Challenge for West is to accommodate some non-Western values for the sake of peace

 

KANT ONLINE, "GROUNDWORK OF METAPHYSICS OF MORALS" #1

Ÿ         Kant is 1760s German philosopher, arguing reason itself demands we be moral

Ÿ         The good will as the only intrinsic good

Ÿ         We have to do our duty, that is only way to ensure our actions are morally right

Ÿ         Duty versus inclination

Ÿ         Moral worth from doing the right thing, even when you don't want to

Ÿ         Categorical imperative's 4 examples

Ÿ         Maxim = rule that guides your actions

Ÿ         Ends = valuable by themselves ; means = valuable only for their use

Ÿ         3 versions of the categorical imperative: universalizing maxims, treat people as ends, dictate and obey moral law

 

BOWIE ONLINE

Ÿ         Kant is relevant to business today

Ÿ         Moral goodness = intention to do duty and respect persons

Ÿ         Any act that puts money on same level as people is wrong

Ÿ         Categorical versus hypothetical imperatives: what we have to do versus what we want to do because it's in our interest

Ÿ         3 versions of categorical imperative

Ÿ         Example of GM and contracts

Ÿ         Kantian open book management

Ÿ         Live by the rules you set for others

Ÿ         Compatible with stakeholder theory of obligations

 

KANT ONLINE, "PERPETUAL PEACE" #2

Ÿ         Comparison of politics to morality

Ÿ         Cassidy's reader's challenge: replace 'politics' with 'business'!

Ÿ         Most people agree what is moral but this morality is impractical when it comes to politics

Ÿ         Act justly no matter how others act, no matter if it is against your political interest

Ÿ         "Political moralist" = crafty leader who only obeys morals when it is in his interest

Ÿ         (Moral) right exists objectively and must always be respected; human rights are holy

Ÿ         Publicity = to test if acts are moral, imagine publicizing you maxims

Ÿ         3 examples of how publicity of right works: state, international, cosmopolitan

Ÿ         Final maxim brings politics to always being moral

 

 

UN ONLINE

Ÿ         Written and agreed upon UN General Assembly of 1948

Ÿ         Inherent dignity and unalienable (= un-seperate-able) rights of all human

Ÿ         Overlaps with religious + natural law ethics, and Kant's human rights ethics

Ÿ         Articles 23-25 relate to business ethics

 

ROBINSON ONLINE

Ÿ         Robinson is UN commissioner on human rights

Ÿ         Mission: make globalization work for everyone by making it more humane

Ÿ         Human rights are the responsibility of individuals, states, and corporations

Ÿ         WTO member states agreed to respect human rights

Ÿ         But what does it mean to practice this?

Ÿ         AIDS example shows how complicated delivering human rights is

Ÿ         UN Global Compact = private corporations make a commitment to human rights

Ÿ         Corporations need to go beyond legal requirements to moral requirements: rights, labor, environment

 

PLEASE NOTE: THIS READING IS NOT ASSIGNED FOR MINI SUMMER I

NEW YORK TIMES SPECIAL ISSUE (6/6/04) ONLINE

Lewis on "Irresponsible Investor"

Ÿ         Rap sheet on American investors

Ÿ         Google tries to respond to market and not be evil

Ÿ         Investors seem to get off the hook for corporate ills but they are responsible

Ÿ         Prof. McElhaney's research: how do we turn corporate social responsibility into money?

Ÿ         Is corporate social responsibility simply self-interest in fancy dress

Ÿ         Birkenstock example: what does it show?

 

Dubner and Levitt on "Bagel Man"

Ÿ         Paul F., economist and bagel dude

Ÿ         Surprising findings of who pays what and when

Ÿ         Factors: kind of jobs, employment situation, size of company, etc.

Ÿ         Comparison of taxes to bagels

Ÿ         Would you pay for the bagels?

 

Walker on "Brewed Awakening"

Ÿ         Fair trade coffee is example of branding plus ethics

Ÿ         Demands to be consistently "good" consumer are hard to meet

Ÿ         Feeling good about what you buy is part of marketing scheme

Ÿ         Is fair trade coffee a first step?

Ÿ         Cassidy's note: the Ramapo cafeteria now sells fair trade coffee!

 

 

MILL ONLINE, "UTILITARIANISM" #1

Ÿ         Mill is 1850's English philosopher, arguing that morality is creating general happiness

Ÿ         Utilitarianism = greatest happiness for the greatest number overall

Ÿ         Consequentialism = act to produce best consequences in any situation; one's intention does not matter as much as the results of the action

Ÿ         Happiness (more pleasure than pain) is what we all are after

Ÿ         Higher versus lower pleasures: utilitarianism is not a "doctrine worthy of swine"

Ÿ         Decided preferences: those who know both kinds will prefer higher pleasures overall

Ÿ         Human happiness is the goals of our actions including morality

Ÿ         Utilitarian will sacrifice some of own happiness for greatest happiness overall b/c that in the end will make them happiest

Ÿ         Jesus was a utilitarian

 

SINGER PG. 1-13 and 43-50

Ÿ         Singer is a contemporary utilitarian philosopher who draws on Mill

Ÿ         Thesis of book: we need to respond to globalization with new ethics for sake of morality and own security

Ÿ         Treaty of Westaphalia gave rise to nation-states having sovereignty within own borders, but this model of nations is outmoded by globalization

Ÿ         Global South (or South) = Third World countries

Ÿ         Bush vs. Singer: Americans first?

Ÿ         We skipped: Singer details how carbon pollution (global warming) is causing real harm to people in Global South and evaluate different options to solve problem

Ÿ         Singer's solution: each country get carbon credits by population

Ÿ         A good start: US should sign on to Kyoto Protocol, which limits carbon pollution

 

MILL ONLINE, "ON LIBERTY" #2

Ÿ         Principle of Liberty: only justified in interfering with others when they are about to harm you

Ÿ         Mill is worried about governmental and social interference with liberties

Ÿ         Each individual is sovereign (= ruler) over his own body and mind, but not so for children

Ÿ         Utility is 'grounded in the permanent interests of man as a progressive being' = greatest happiness demands people have individual liberty

Ÿ         Direct vs. indirect harm

Ÿ         Paragraph 4 lists 3 main domains of liberty

Ÿ         Beginning chapter 5: free trade is part of liberty

Ÿ         Control for the sake of protecting people is ok, but control to inhibit liberty is not

Ÿ         Examples: selling poisons, selling alcholol/drugs

 

 

SINGER PG. 51-77 and 96-105

Ÿ         WTO and GATT are designed to encourage world trade; if trade increases, people in general will be better off

Ÿ         What were the protesters in Seattle so upset about?

Ÿ         Four charges made against WTO, see page 55

Ÿ         Charge #1: WTO puts money above people, environment, and other concerns

Ÿ         WTO’s official policies at odd with its practices

Ÿ         “Process vs. product” interpretation of WTO fair trade policy; dolphin-tuna example

Ÿ         Singer: not looking at process of how something is made allows for great environmental or human rights abuses; GATT’s article XX is ignored

Ÿ         Charge #2 against WTO: Interferes with national sovereignty

Ÿ         Technically, WTO does not interfere but 1 once you join its hard to quit 2 its hard not to join

Ÿ         Charge #3 against WTO: Undemocratic

Ÿ         WTO works by consensus (veto rule) which is not same as democracy and major powers make all the big decisions anyway

Ÿ         Charge #4 against WTO: Makes poor poorer and rich richer

Ÿ         We skipped: Singer carefully goes over the evidence for and against this claim and finds that the info that would decide this charge (comparisons of household incomes) is not available

Ÿ         Can’t tell if charge #4 is true or not

Ÿ         Many poor countries’ governments are said to be ‘legitimate’ (in that they control the territory) but are not legit in that they do no reflect will of the people

Ÿ         Singer: only legit governments to be able to sell nonrenewable resources, and international law to make sure this is so

 

LOCKE ONLINE

Ÿ         Locke is 1670's English philosopher in natural law tradition (see Aquinas)

Ÿ         Background: God made us all free, equal, with common land and endowed with 3 human rights (to life, liberty, and property)

Ÿ         State of Nature = imaginary time before there were any laws or legal authorities

Ÿ         Labor theory of property; this arrangement increases the welfare of mankind

Ÿ         Own as much as you work in state of nature, but it is wrong to hoard food or waste it

Ÿ         Rise of money related to spoilage

Ÿ         Social compact: society based on protection of inalienable rights to life, liberty and property

 

SMITH ONLINE

Ÿ         Smith is 1770's English economist, who notices rise of middle class in Europe

Ÿ         Division of labor increases productivity and happens organically

Ÿ         Pin example at beginning of chpt. 1

Ÿ         3 advantages of the division of labor

Ÿ         All aspects of common man's life, work, personal effects are produced through social cooperation that is not directed by state, but necessity

Ÿ         Greyhound example at beginning of chpt. 2

Ÿ         People are egoistic (self interested) individuals and a good society is each person looking out for herself

Ÿ         Cooperation is necessary in society but it is produced not out of good will but need

Ÿ         Famous quote about 'butcher, brewer or baker' 2nd para., chpt. 2

Ÿ         Dissimilar talents help mankind overall, without aid of a common director

 

FRIEDMAN PG. 7-21

Ÿ         Friedman is contemporary economist who draws on Locke and Smith

Ÿ         Vs. view that a socialist economy + political freedom is possible

Ÿ         Economic freedom is end in itself and is means for political freedom

Ÿ         Freedom is freedom, be it econ, religious, poli or personal

Ÿ         Vs. various ways our govt restrict freedom: taxes and professional licenses

Ÿ         History links econ and poli freedom in some cases

Ÿ         Simple trades need freedom: picking our own economic choices reduces the role of government in our lives

Ÿ         Example pg. 16-17 : How would a repressive communist system support political dissent?

Ÿ         Other exs of government repression: Churchill, Hollywood blacklist, McCarthyism

Ÿ         Assumes people make choices based on econ self-interest

 

HENDERSON ONLINE

Ÿ         Henderson is contemporary economist who defends Friedman

Ÿ         CSR = a doctrine that corporations have econ, enviorn, and social duties to non-share holding parties

Ÿ         Vs. CSR as a belief system for 2 reasons: distorts reality, bad consequences

Ÿ         Popularity of CSR doesn't make it right

Ÿ         Vs. global salvationism: dispute that globalization needs to be softened by corporations

Ÿ         CSR disputes fundamentals of capitalism

Ÿ         CSR raises costs, stifled competition, and invites overregulating

 

FRIEDMAN PG.119-136

Ÿ         Monopoly: control over good or service that can determine others' access to it

Ÿ         2 problems: limits on exchange and raises issue of social responsibility

Ÿ         3 kinds of monopoly: industry, labor, government (note: much of his data is outdated)

Ÿ         People overestimate and worry about industrial monopoly too much

Ÿ         Labor unions are an unchecked example of labor monopoly (vs. labor unions)

Ÿ         Government licensure is government example (vs. government); taxi example

Ÿ         His position: curb any kind of monopoly that interferes with individual liberty

Ÿ         Pay special attention to pgs. 133-6 - this is what he is most famous for!

Ÿ         Vs. social responsibility of corps or unions, only responsibility is to make money for its shareholders

Ÿ         Social responsibility doctrine hinders free society and confuses role of business with role of charity

 

PLEASE NOTE: THIS READING IS NOT ASSIGNED FOR MINI SUMMER I

T. FRIEDMAN ONLINE

· Friedman is contemporary journalist who thinks globalization can be good overall
· Lexus (technology and prosperity) vs. olive tree (roots and sense of identity)
· Premise: cold war is replaced with globalization, but there are growing pains
· Electronic herd at Davor Forum; backlash fights against Golden Straightjacket of globalization
· Rainforest example: fast world vs. turtles
· Who fights against globalization: the used to be’s in the industrialized world
· Backlash against globalization: 3rd world (including Baltimore!) can’t catch up
· Other backlash against cultural globalization: homogenizes people
· Irrational exuberance: why Friedman is optimistic pg. 298-303
· Things we have here other countries don’t: good geography, multicultural, markets, honest government, easy bankruptcy, immigrants, flexible politics, flexible labor, etc.
 

MARX ONLINE

Ÿ         Marx is 1850's German/English philosopher reacting to his age of globalization and labor strikes

Ÿ         Bourgeoisie (capitalist owners) vs. proletariat (workers) is age-old conflict of have and have-nots

Ÿ         Bourgeoisie turn every place into a market and everything into a commodity

Ÿ         Bourgeoisie are a productive forces (wealth) and destructive force (man and nature)

Ÿ         Commodification of labor in industrialized capitalism

Ÿ         Alienation of laborer from his labor

Ÿ         Capitalism turns average worker into mind-numbed drone

Ÿ         Need to abolish private property so that people own what they work on and have a say in their own work-live

 

PLEASE NOTE: THIS READING IS NOT ASSIGNED FOR MINI SUMMER I

BAUDRILLARD ONLINE

Ÿ         Baudrillard is contemporary French philosopher - not a communist per se, but like Marx is critical of capitalism

Ÿ         Modern society is not by, for, and about objects - not nature or people

Ÿ         Accumulation and collection are carefully designed to manipulate people into consumer behaviors

Ÿ         Drug store = mall, mini-malls, CVSs, Targets, and any similar type of shopping enviorn

Ÿ         Homo economicus = economic man; a fictional man who operates according to 2 assumptions

Ÿ         Econ man model assumes that satisfaction of artificially created consumer wants = happiness

Ÿ         Disneyworld is becoming the model of not just business but our entire lives

Ÿ         Disney obliterates real/virtual, fact/fantasy, info/advert, etc. distinctions

 

LASN PG. 37-41 + 65-96

Ÿ         Lasn is contemporary Canadian who used to work in ads and media

Ÿ         This is a polemic, an impassioned speech that is not meant to be objective

Ÿ         Lasn, like Baudrillard, wants us to challenge consumer culture

Ÿ         Manchurian candidate comparison to US consumerism

Ÿ         History of American economics: Santa Clara vs. Southern Pacific decision pg. 68

Ÿ         pg. 73-4 exs. of Janet, Matt, Sarah, Randy: recognize anyone you know?

Ÿ         Expansionist vs. ecological views on economy pg. 86-90

 

LASN PG. 144-183

Ÿ         Culture jammer: someone who rebels in big or small ways against consumer culture

Ÿ         Culture jamming will reclaim self-rule (sovereignty) from big corporations

Ÿ         Put corporations on alert  by revoking their public charters, begin ad campaigns to that effect

Ÿ         Uncooling is de-marketing, this is another way to regain sovereignty

Ÿ         Uncooling examples of food, fashion, autos, etc.

;